The order has been passed by the Learned AO by taking one of the ...

Income Tax

March 26, 2016

The order has been passed by the Learned AO by taking one of the possible views and hence the order cannot be termed as erroneous warranting initiation of revision proceedings u/s 263 - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The order has been passed by the Learned AO by taking one of the ...

Income Tax

March 26, 2016

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - The principal of the law emanating that when two views are legally possible and AO adopts one view the Assessment Order cannot be said to be erroneous...

The view taken by the AO in computing book profit u/s 115JB being an acceptable view, the assessment order passed cannot be considered to be erroneous - revision set aside - AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Revision u/s 263 - carry forward of losses on sale of shares - where there are two possible views and the Assessing Officer has taken one of the possible views, no...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - sale of impugned land measuring 10.162 acres below the stamp duty value - under the given circumstances, it can be safely concluded that the...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - if the AO has adopted one of the two or more courses permissible in law and it has resulted in loss of revenue, or where two views are possible...

Revision u/s 263 - When the AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has resulted in loss to the revenue, or where two views are possible and the AO has...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

Revision u/s 263 - the issue was duly considered by Ld. AO after considering assessee’s detailed submissions. The view could not be said to be unsustainable view and it...

Revision u/s 263 - ‘On-money’ receipt - the view taken by the A.O. was one of the possible views and the assessment order passed by him could not be held to be erroneous...

Quick Updates: