Valuation of goods cleared to own sister units for captive ...

Central Excise

April 7, 2016

Valuation of goods cleared to own sister units for captive consumption - Determination of the cost of production as per CAS-4 - The adjudicating authority has correctly determined the cost of production of copper anodes manufactured by the appellants - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation of goods cleared to own sister units for captive ...

Central Excise

April 7, 2016

You may also like:

Valuation - captive consumption - Frequency or periodicity of costing in terms of CAS-4 - the CAS-4 cost price arrived at on annual basis by the Revenue is correct procedure - AT

Valuation - Captive consumption - VIT cleared for captive consumption of the appellant's own unit at Nasik - Applying the principle of comparable price, order modified partly - SC

Assessable value - correct method to arrive at assessable value for the goods captively used by sister unit in manufacturing of final product is only CAS-4 - AT

Central Excise – Captive Consumption - Enhancement of Duty - Valuation - CAS 4 - interest cost is not liability of included. - AT

Valuation - clearances to sister units - Assessee has not produced CAS-4 certificate - The entire issue is revenue neutral. The appellant would be eligible for credit...

Clearance of castings made to other unit - interest on loan is not required to be included for the purpose of valuation under Rule 8 read with CAS-4 plust 15% - AT

Valuation - clearance to sister unit - applicability of Rule 4 of the Valuation Rules or Rule 8 - the Ld. Commissioner, in his impugned order in para 3.8, while...

Valuation - goods cleared to sister concern - Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules specifically prescribes that the valuation for purpose of charging of excise duty...

Valuation of goods - Undervaluation - determination of cost of production as per CAS-4 - inclusion of interest expenditure, depreciation and profit margin - tribunal...

Valuation - clearance to sister unit - goods were not fully finished - the valuation could not have been done under Rule 9 of Central Excise Valuation Rules 2000 - AT

Quick Updates: