Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2016 Year 2016 This

Amount of repayment - deductiblility in computing the income in ...

Income Tax

May 2, 2016

Amount of repayment - deductiblility in computing the income in the year of receipt - Once it is clear that the liability arose on the date of the contract but what was postponed was only the payment, there is no escape from the conclusion that the assessee can claim the expenditure in the year of Fixed Deposit Receipt. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Deductibility of the amount of service tax paid under VCES, 2013 - contention of the assessee is that the amount paid was a discharge of liability which got crystallized...

  2. Addition u/s 68 - evidences about the receipt of the cash and repayment of the cash despite those persons having proper bank account - whole explanation of the assessee...

  3. Incentive had to be utilized for the repayment of loans taken to set up new units – A capital receipt not taxable

  4. Amount received for voting in favor of resolution is a casual receipt in the nature of windfall arising not taxable - HC

  5. Liquidated damages paid for delay in delivery of materials is deductible expenditure in the year in which the liability to pay arises as per the agreement between the...

  6. Fabrication of structures at various sites would amount to manufacture and hence will not fall under the category of erection, installation and commissioning and no...

  7. Remission of loan liability - waiver of the loan amount was a capital receipt not taxable as business income of the assessee - AT

  8. Allowable expenditure versus Application of Income (Repayment of loan) - Payment made to the Marketing Board - progressive payments given to the Haryana State...

  9. Remission / cessation of liability u/s 41(1) - CIT(A) was justified in deleting this addition because the amount stood remitted in the earlier year and not the current year - AT

  10. Revision u/s 263 - bogus liability towards purchases - payment in expenditure cash during the next year - The implications, if any, in respect of discharge of liability...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates