Commissioner ought to have stayed the adjudication proceedings ...

Customs

May 7, 2016

Commissioner ought to have stayed the adjudication proceedings since the issue was pending before various Tribunals at different stages would lead to absurd - there is always a possibility of further legal proceedings being taken out by the aggrieved party - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Commissioner ought to have stayed the adjudication proceedings ...

Customs

May 7, 2016

You may also like:

Clandestine removal - vanaspati - Seeking for keeping in abeyance the further proceeding pending in the court of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Special...

Suspension of the licence of the petitioner as custom broker - petitioner directed to surrender the licence when appeal is pending before the tribunal - order dated...

Appellate Tribunal has committed a positive error in consciously extending the interim order of stay granted in the pending appeal beyond the period of 365 days - HC

Validity of Show cause notice issued in 2011 - long pending issue - Reasonable period of limitation for adjudication of case - The fact that the petitioner has...

Mediation and Conciliation - by virtue of Sub-section 2 of Section 442, any of the parties to the proceeding during the proceedings pending before this Tribunal is...

Petition for quashing the Notice issued u/s 263 of the Act – he petitioner ought not to have approached the Writ Court at the stage of show cause notice - HC

GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods...

Recovery proceedings - initiation of recovery proceeding for not disposal of the stay applications before this Tribunal for no fault of the assesses, is unfair and unwarranted - AT

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Denial of natural justice - the intricacies involved in the issues require an elaborate adjudication and admittedly, the petitioner is...

Tribunal power under the Act to extend the stay of demand in the appeals pending before it beyond the period of 365 days - Nothing has been shown to us as to why when...

Quick Updates: