Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2016 Year 2016 This

Imposition of penalty - Appellant submitted that he has resigned ...

Customs

May 11, 2016

Imposition of penalty - Appellant submitted that he has resigned from the company and hence no penalty should be imposed on him - in the absence of any inculpatory statement of the appellant, penalty on the appellant is not imposable - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. It was open for the Settlement Commission to impose penalty on the directors in addition to imposing penalty on the company, if there was material justifying imposition...

  2. Imposition of penalties - Mere collection and delay to remit to the Government cannot be considered as an act of suppression - The penalty imposed u/s 78 is unwarranted.

  3. Imposition of penalty - Mis-declaration of imported goods - Smuggling - penalty cannot be imposed both on the proprietor as well as the firm.

  4. Imposition of penalties - Apart from the statement there are ample documentary evidences which clearly establish that appellants were involved in aiding and abetting...

  5. Imposition of penalty - Penalty cannot be imposed if there is no malafide on part of importer, no tests have been carried out and no expert opinion has been obtained - AT

  6. Power of settlement commission - Settlement Commission is within its powers to impose penalty on each of the Directors in addition to the imposition of penalty upon the...

  7. Imposition of penalty - when there was conflict of judicial opinion before the issue stood settled by the judgment of this Court, it is not a case where penalty should...

  8. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

  9. Imposition of Simultaneous Penalties - Whether CESTAT erred in imposing simultaneous penalties on both the Partner and Partnership firm – Matter referred to larger bench - HC

  10. Penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 & 78 - renting of immovable property - case is squarely covered for non imposition of penalties under Section 80A - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates