Addition to income - scrutiny assessment u/s 143(2) - his ...

Income Tax

May 14, 2016

Addition to income - scrutiny assessment u/s 143(2) - his statement was recorded from the back of the assessee, and no opportunity to cross-examine the deposer was given to the assessee. Hence, this statement cannot be used against the assessee - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition to income - scrutiny assessment u/s 143(2) - his ...

Income Tax

May 14, 2016

You may also like:

Addition on account of unexplained source of investment - seller declared higher price of sales value - cross examination - when the statement of the seller is solely...

Conversion of “Limited Scrutiny” into “Complete Scrutiny” - Expanding the scope of limited scrutiny assessment without necessary approval - Since the notice under...

Addition u/s 69 - Until and unless these witnesses were present during the assessment proceedings, the assessee was denied the proper opportunity of cross examination....

Clandestine removal - denial of opportunity of cross-examination of witnesses - The only question is at what stage would he be entitled to cross-examine the witnesses -...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

Validity of notice u/s 143(2) - scrutiny assessment - issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) by correct AO - As per CBDT instruction the scrutiny noticemust be issued by the...

Scrutiny assessment - Issue of notices u/s 143(2) of Income-tax Act, 1961 in revised format-regd. - Notification

Scope of the Adjustment made by the CPC u/s 143(1) when scrutiny assessment made u/s 143(3) - Considering the facts that the case of the assessee was subsequently taken...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO did not issue the notice under section 143(2) - It is the discretion of the Assessing Officer to accept the return of...

Dishonour of Cheque - right of the accused to cross examine the complainant - The trial Court, committed error in observing that the petitioner is silent on the specific...

Quick Updates: