Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - declaration of income recorded ...

Income Tax

June 27, 2016

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - declaration of income recorded u/s.132(4) - It is the settled position of law that penalty proceedings and assessment proceedings are separate and distinct. The assessee can advance new arguments during penalty proceedings - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - declaration of income recorded ...

Income Tax

June 27, 2016

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

Penalty u/s 271AAA - Assessment u/s 153C - search and seizure proceedings u/s 132(1) not carried out against the assessee - the primary condition of section 271AAA...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - difference of income in the return filed u/s.139(1) and 153A - there was no such allegation that of assessee was found to be the owner of any...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - It is a settled position that assessment and penalty proceedings are two separate and distinct proceedings and though reference can be...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - protective assessment - there can be a protective order qua assessment, there cannot be a protective order in respect of penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - declaration of additional income u/s.132(4) - due date of filing of return - Once the legislature has not specified the “due date“ as provided in...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

Addition on account of income surrendered as per statement u/s 132(4) - though the statement recorded u/s 132(4) has a better evidentiary value but it is also a settled...

Undisclosed Income - scope of statements recorded u/s 132(4) - admission of payment of Capitation Fee to the Engineering College does not mean ipso facto declaration of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

Quick Updates: