It cannot be the case that if one person could not be caught ...

Income Tax

July 8, 2016

It cannot be the case that if one person could not be caught while infringing the law then, other one has also right to infringe or to break the law. - Addition on the basis of noting found in the seized paper confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

It cannot be the case that if one person could not be caught ...

Income Tax

July 8, 2016

You may also like:

Refund alongwith Interest - amount deposited during search proceedings - If tax is collected without any authority of law, the same would amount to depriving a person of...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) against Settlement Commission order - The Tribunal found the reassessment to infringe upon the principles laid out by...

Burden of proof in case of Smuggling Activity - This discharge of burden of proof, in our opinion, can only happen in cases where there is a reasonable possibility of...

Validity of Initiation of proceedings u/s 153C - as argued satisfaction note of the searched person and satisfaction note of the petitioner (other than the searched...

Import for Mega Power Project under exemption scheme - Auto Renewal of Security deposited as Fixed Deposit - This Court is of an opinion that Auto Renewal clause is a...

IPR service - Transfer of rights - Since we have found a prima facie case on the ground that the transfer in this case cannot be considered as a temporary one, stay granted - AT

Suspension of Customs Broker License - Deemed Suspension or automatic suspension? - There is no existence of any provision of “Deemed Suspension” or “automatic...

Extension of time for filing of ITR - If no right is infringed and no prejudice is found to be caused to the petitioner, merely because no prejudice would be caused to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

Seizure orders - The transporter who is not the owner of the seized goods has no right or interest in them therefore, refusal of the authorities to release the said...

Quick Updates: