In the given circumstances, the CIT(A) could not have question ...

Income Tax

July 15, 2016

In the given circumstances, the CIT(A) could not have question the maintainability of the application of the Assessee before the DIT(E) u/s. 264 of the Act. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

In the given circumstances, the CIT(A) could not have question ...

Income Tax

July 15, 2016

You may also like:

Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

Renewal/grant of certificate u/s 80G - Unless the DIT(E) records the reasons of violation of such conditions, the DIT(E) cannot reject the assessee's application - AT

Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by amalgamated company - order of CIT rejecting the application is erroneous - refund allowed u/s 237 - Tri

Reopening of assessment - mere information conveyed by DIT does not constitute to be a tangible material to re-assess the assessee company without any independent...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - the appeal of the Assessee has not been disposed on merits. In view of this, there was no bar to the CIT in exercising...

Reasonable cause for the delay in filing the revision application before the CIT under Section 264 - HC

Revision petition u/s. 264 - disallowance of carry forward of loss to subsequent years - CIT while disposing of the 264 petition of the assessee, had clearly directed...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - It is manifest that only suo-motu power of the Commissioner under Section 264 of the IT Act, is restricted against an order...

Revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - Application u/s 264 rejected as intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act is not an order amenable to revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - The...

Condonation of delay filling Revision u/s 264 - refund of the FBT return - Powers conferred under Section 264 of the Act are very wide. Commissioner is bound to apply...

Quick Updates: