Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2016 Year 2016 This

Penalty u/s 271D - share application money exceeding ₹ ...

Income Tax

August 2, 2016

Penalty u/s 271D - share application money exceeding ₹ 20,000/- was received in cash - assessee has squarely failed in pointing out any reasonable cause as why the money was received in cash despite both the subscriber and assessee company having enjoyed bank facilities - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s. 271D r.w.s. 273B - reasonable cause for the assessee to accept loan over ₹ 20,000/- in cash - levy of penalty confirmed.

  2. Validity of confirmation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – ssessee miserably failed to offer an explanation for the cash credit raised in the form of share application money -...

  3. Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - share application money - amount was received during the earlier years - entries made during the current year for converting deposits...

  4. Levy of penalty u/s. 271D - treating the share application money as deposit u/s 269SS - once the A.O. has treated the share application money received by the assessee in...

  5. Penalty for cash loan/ transactions against primary co-operatives - Section 269SS / 269T - Relief given to Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (“PACS”) and Primary...

  6. Penalty u/s 271D - Penalty can be levied on the amounts of loan which exceeds the amount of ₹ 20,000/-. Therefore, the A.O. is directed to exclude ₹ 20,000/-...

  7. Important advisory for e-Invoice for Taxpayers having annual turnover exceeding ₹ 20 Crores - SGST

  8. Share application money received - No evidence has been brought on record by the Assessing Officer to prove that the share application money emanated from the coffers of...

  9. Penalty u/s 271D - Default u/s 269SS - loans in question were received by the assessee in cash from her daughter and son-in-law - no penalty leviable

  10. Levy of penalty u/s 271D and 271E - transaction of advance and its receipt back in cash in excess of ₹ 20,000/- - Assessee failed to substantiate that it is trade...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates