TDS default - Considering the penal nature of section 221, it ...

Income Tax

September 15, 2016

TDS default - Considering the penal nature of section 221, it would be in the fitness of things to make a distinction between a case where the TDS is deposited suo-motu before any proceedings are initiated by the Assessing Officer and a case where the deposit of the TDS is made after initiation of proceedings by the Assessing Officer but before levy of penalty. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

TDS default - Considering the penal nature of section 221, it ...

Income Tax

September 15, 2016

You may also like:

Section 194S : TDS on payment on transfer of virtual digital asset - Deduction of Tax at Source (TDS), Collection of Tax at Source (TCS) / Withholding Tax

Suo motu adjustment of excess service tax paid – Rule 6(4A) - stay granted.

Cenvat credit – suo motu credit on the amount paid by assessee erroneously earlier – suo motu credit availed by the appellant is inadmissible to them - AT

Suo motu adjustment of excess payment of service tax made in October, 2008 with subsequent service liability - procedural violation - demand of service tax of the said...

Suo motu credit of the differential amount of service tax - lesser payment made by the customers - merely minor infraction of the rule - adjustment allowed - AT

Suo moto availing of credit - there was nothing wrong in taking of suo motu credit after getting favourable orders from CESTAT, when unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Remitting the matter to higher forum for decision on merits - It would be in the fitness of things that the matter is remitted to the DRP rather than AO - HC

Amount paid towards penalty for breach of commercial contract by the assessee is not penal in nature, but compensatory in nature - deduction u/s 37(1) allowed - HC

Deduction u/s 37(1) - Nature of payment - Whether shaman shulk paid to Excise Department is penal in nature - The amount cannot be treated to be penalty, which can be...

Deduction u/s 80I - Service charge - Ownership is not necessary - The only thing that has to be seen is whether the source of the profit or gains is an industrial undertaking - HC

Quick Updates: