Non-receipt of amount of service tax from his client cannot be ...

Service Tax

September 17, 2016

Non-receipt of amount of service tax from his client cannot be adopted as a excuse for non-payment of service tax to the exchequer when the liability lies heavily on the appellant himself. As such, we find no justifiable reason for invoking provisions of section 80 so as to set aside the penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-receipt of amount of service tax from his client cannot be ...

Service Tax

September 17, 2016

You may also like:

Penalty - Non deposit of amount of service tax collected from the client - benefit of payment of penalty of 25% extend to the appellant. - AT

Penalty - Non payment of service tax amount to the department despite being collected from the client - bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Interest - Service Tax liability is always leviable on immovable property, hence non payment of tax on amount of rent collected attracts interest - AT

Service tax liability - Undertaking of maintenance or repair services for self and for client do not attract tax liability under Management maintenance and repair...

Addition of amounts written off - payment of service tax to its distributors - when the assessee company has paid amount to its distributors who had actually paid the...

Applicability of section 43B on payment of service tax - Non-inclusion of service tax in gross receipts – AT

TDS u/s 194C - The assessee having made the payments on behalf of its clients, there is no liability to deduct tax at source on the assessee - AT

After giving voluntary statements admitting the non-payment of Service Tax and giving an undertaking to discharge the outstanding Service Tax liability, one cannot seek...

Suo motu adjustment of excess payment of service tax made in October, 2008 with subsequent service liability - procedural violation - demand of service tax of the said...

Deductibility of the amount of service tax paid under VCES, 2013 - contention of the assessee is that the amount paid was a discharge of liability which got crystallized...

Quick Updates: