Refund claim - the protest was lodged within reasonable time of ...

Service Tax

September 19, 2016

Refund claim - the protest was lodged within reasonable time of the appellant becoming aware that the amounts were not recoverable as Service Tax. That is sufficient to attract proviso to Section 11B(1) - period of limitation not applicable - refund allowed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - the protest was lodged within reasonable time of ...

Service Tax

September 19, 2016

You may also like:

Refund claim for the amount of CVD paid - time limitation - Duty was paid under protest or not - The appellant, an importer of silk yarn and silk fabrics, filed a refund...

Refund claim rejected as time bared - the amount deposited by the appellant during the investigation can never be construed as a duty - it is held as deposited under...

Denial of refund claim - refund was grated to another manufacturer who has lodged the protest - assessee did not lodged any protest - Bar of limitation - assessee cannot...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund of Customs Duty - duty paid under protest - The appellant themselves has lodged a protest during the pendency of the appeal which is also taken on record - No...

Refund claim of amount deposited during investigation - it would not be necessary to lodge the protest as is otherwise provided under the Rules. Since the appellant has...

Refund claim - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - Time bar - benefit of ‘payment of duty under protest’ made by the manufacturer cannot be extended to the buyer - AT

SEZ unit - refund claim - since the appellants have intimated their protest within reasonable time, that is within 2 weeks of payment of duty, this letter issued by them...

Refund of service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism - time limitation - refund claim has to be filed within one year from the relevant date - AT

Refund of Service tax - amount was paid under protest - time limitation - Tribunal held that appellants are not liable to pay service tax vide order issued on 16.11.2016...

Quick Updates: