Relevance / validity of statement made u/s 133A - Even if, for ...

Income Tax

September 27, 2016

Relevance / validity of statement made u/s 133A - Even if, for the sake of arguments, we assume it so, it is to be noticed that the assessee had paid taxes on the income disclosed and if the AO would have accepted his returned income as per the disclosure, the assessee would have got no chance or opportunity to claim that the disclosure made by him was under force, coercion or duress. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Relevance / validity of statement made u/s 133A - Even if, for ...

Income Tax

September 27, 2016

You may also like:

Validity of reopening assessment - unexplained investment - survey u/s 133A - the vague statements giving estimated details without supporting evidence would not help...

Addition to additional income offered during the survey action - dumb document - relevance / validity of statement made u/s 133A - threat undue influence or coercion -...

Dishonour of Cheque - Non service of notice on the accused - Even otherwise, for the sake of argument, if this notice was not received by him, no efforts have been made...

Validity of survey - denial of natural justice - the survey could be conducted even prior to insertion of subsection (2A) of section 133A. - AT

Validity of Survey proceedings u/s 133A conducted in absence of assessee - Manner of conducting survey u/s 133A - There was a time gap of more than 3 ½ years between the...

Addition on undisclosed income cannot be made on the basis of the statement recorded during the survey under section 133A - AT

Validity of statement made during survey u/s 133A - When cash was admittedly found in possession of the employee of the assessee, it cannot be stated that additions were...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reasons to believe - A.O. had no tangible evidence to initiate the re-assessment proceedings against the petitioner and the impugned...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - no original assessment order in the case of the assessee passed - Even assuming for the sake of argument that if an intimation under...

Statement recorded u/s 133A (3)(iii) is different than the statement recorded during search and seizure u/s 132(4), both have different evidentiary value

Quick Updates: