Validity of CESTAT order - Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the ...

Service Tax

September 27, 2016

Validity of CESTAT order - Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the ground that matter is pending before the High court - Doctrine of merger - It could not have been dismissed as not maintainable only because the petitioner in the writ petition and the appellant before the Tribunal were pursuing both remedies. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of CESTAT order - Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the ...

Service Tax

September 27, 2016

You may also like:

Validity of reopening - Validity of notice u/s 148 when scrutiny assessment was made but same was annulled - doctrine of merger is not applicable - reopening of the case...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - Where the issue sought to be rectified was not appealed before HC, application cannot be rejected on the ground of Doctrine of merger - HC

Doctrine of merger - Earlier Supreme Court dismissed appeal as non maintainable - Once leave to appeal has been granted and appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court has...

Revision u/s 263 or appeal-able order before CIT(A) u/s 246A - Subject matter of revision was limited - Doctrine of merger - CIT(A) and ITAT rejected the appeal of...

Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 (VCES) - inquiry or investigation which is pending - Scope of notices correspondence between assessee and...

Refund claim - Period of limitation - Doctrine of merger - importer having registered a ‘Protest’ - The Tribunal held that, "the doctrine of merger" implies that the...

Doctrine of Merger - under the Doctrine of Merger, the Commissioner was not correct in re-visiting the issue which was already concluded in the remanded matter by the...

Applicability of Doctrine of merger – doctrine of merger will not be applicable inasmuch as the subject matter of appeal by party was entirely different with the subject...

Period of limitation - as per the principles of doctrine of merger, the limitation period should not operate as a bar to the revisional authority in exercise of the power - HC

Extension of time for pre-deposit - matter pending before high court - appellant wants to evade the mandate of Section 35F CEA as applicable to ST appeals - appeal...

Quick Updates: