Whether the re-assessment was permissible under the head of ...

VAT and Sales Tax

September 30, 2016

Whether the re-assessment was permissible under the head of “Rectification of the order in purported exercise of the power u/s 69 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 on the basis of a clarification issued by the Commissioner which itself is after the order of re-assessment dated 28.6.2010? - Held no - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whether the re-assessment was permissible under the head of ...

VAT and Sales Tax

September 30, 2016

You may also like:

Power of Tribunal to recall its earlier order and hear the appeal afresh - power to review or power of rectification – Tribunal committed no error in exercising power...

Collection of penalty without order - Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - collection of penalty without an order u/s Section 53(12)(c), is illegal and can hardly be...

Validity of assessment order - Since, the levy of tax under the Act on the sale of goods during the course of import was an error apparent on the face of the record, the...

Unexplained income of the assessee u/s 69 - While exercising power u/s 260A we cannot consider ourselves as the Third Appellate Authority and reexamine the facts - HC

Levy of Value Added Tax (VAT) - The State Government cannot enrich by wrongly bringing the transportation charges and the installation charges as part of sale price of...

Amnesty Scheme - Additional Commissioner has no power to reject the application under Amnesty Scheme - Power only could have been exercised by the Commissioner, VAT Delhi - HC

Delegation of powers u/s GST - Section 5(3) of the Act specifically confers power upon the Commissioner to delegate his functions - The power u/s 69 can be exercised by...

Authorities can exercise such powers, if there is any error apparent on the face of the record which requires rectification - HC

Local Authority - Definitions. - Section 2(69) of the CGST ACT, 2017 as amended - Article 371J of the Constitution grants special status to 6 backward districts of...

Waiver of interest and penalty under Sections 36(1) and 72(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - respondent himself has accepted that he has understated his...

Quick Updates: