Demand of interest - Once in terms of the order passed by the ...

Central Excise

September 29, 2016

Demand of interest - Once in terms of the order passed by the adjudicating authority after remand by the Tribunal, there is no delay in deposit of duty by the respondent in view of Section 11AA of the Act, the demand of interest is not justifiable - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand of interest - Once in terms of the order passed by the ...

Central Excise

September 29, 2016

You may also like:

Demand u/s 11AA - SCN not issued - impugned order is only a communication and not a demand to pay the Excise duty together with interest as stated by the respondent - HC

SEEPZ unit - Violation of DTA sale entitlement - Adjudicating authority has computed the duty demand wrongly - Since the Revenue has not come in appeal against the said...

Interest from the Date of Deposit on Delayed Refund - there was no error in the order of the Tribunal refusing to grant interest from the date of deposit - HC

Validity of remanding the matter to the Assessing Authority - the first appellate authority has adjudicated the controversy on merits and therefore, the tribunal, which...

Revision of an order passed after remand back of the order by the Commissioner (appeal) to the adjudicating authority - action of revision is not correct as per law - AT

Confirmation of demand without issuance of Show Cause Notice - Matter remanded back to the adjudicating authority to decide the issue with an independent mind - HC

Interest demand - Commissioner (Appeal) set aside the demand - Tribunal confirmed the demand - Appellants are liable to pay interest, if any, after three months from the...

Determination of duty u/s 11A (2) before demanding interest –- duty was deposited before issuance of show cause notice - SCN demanding interest portion is not invalid - AT

Demand for interest on delayed payment of duty - appellant is liable to pay the interest on the differential duty paid through supplementary invoices.

Interest on delayed refund - The demand was very much existing at the time of passing Tribunal order for the reason that re-quantification was directed to the original...

Quick Updates: