Imposition of penalty under Section 53(3) of AP VAT - under ...

VAT and Sales Tax

October 3, 2016

Imposition of penalty under Section 53(3) of AP VAT - under reporting of taxable turnover - While a bonafide error would fall within the ambit of Section 53(1) of the Act, wilful or intentional under-declaration of tax would fall within the scope of Section 53(3) - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty under Section 53(3) of AP VAT - under ...

VAT and Sales Tax

October 3, 2016

You may also like:

Collection of penalty without order - Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - collection of penalty without an order u/s Section 53(12)(c), is illegal and can hardly be...

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

Recovery of dues - Waterfall mechanism - prevalence of Section 48 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax 2003 over Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 - As...

Levy of Penalty u/s 53(3) of the VAT Act - Under declaration of tax - as the petitioner-assessee was not put on adequate notice with regard to imposition of higher...

Imposition of penalty u/s 53 (12) - movement of goods in the disguise of movement in the course of export to avoid tax liability - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Quantum of penalty - suppression of taxable turnover - imposition of penalty at 200% was excessive and levy of penalty at 100% would meet the ends of justice.

Imposition of penalty - Sales tax registration not obtained - Bonafide belief that registration not required as doing second sale of goods within the State - no merit...

Non-accounting of manufactured goods in the statutory records falls within the ambit of Rules 173Q(1)(b) attracting provision of confiscation and penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 53 - Karnataka VAT - Once statutory contravention is established, then section 53(12) is attracted which provides for levy of penalty - presence of Mens Rea...

Re-fixation of taxable turnover – Non existant concern - the explanation offered by the assessee was disbelieved and rejected, per se would not lead to imposition of penalty - HC

Quick Updates: