Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2016 Year 2016 This

When Customs could detect the mis-declaration simply by ...

Customs

October 6, 2016

When Customs could detect the mis-declaration simply by examining the weight of the consignment with respect to declaration made, it could have been possible for Courier Agency exercising due diligence to detect the same - the due diligence has not been exercised by the courier company - Penalty on courier company confirmed though reduced - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Confiscation - mis-declaration of quantity of goods - there is no dispute that the weight in the invoice was mentioned as per the theoretical weight basis by taking a...

  2. Demand of customs duty based on mis-declaration of weight of imported rough A marble blocks - The Tribunal observed that, it is found that the department established a...

  3. Levy of penalty on shipping line u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - mis-declaration of goods in description as well as in quantity in bills of landing - As the fact has...

  4. When there is mis-declaration of goods, show cause notice can be issued within a period of five years from the date of findng mis-declaration by the investigating authority - AT

  5. Assessable Value – import of Watch Batteries - mis-declaration of classification - No infirmity in respect of applying NIDB data to the batteries imported by the appellant - AT

  6. Illegal import - misdeclaration of goods - enhancement of value - The details contained were vague and there was a clear attempt in mis-declaration of high value...

  7. Valuation - Enhancement of value of the imported RPO - CESTAT held that, in the present case neither any contemporaneous value was adopted nor any method as prescribed...

  8. Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

  9. Import of Toyota Land Cruiser Prada Car - Mis declaration of model of the car as 1996 model, which is actually 2003 - applicant failed to make out a prima facie case - AT

  10. Mis-declaration of description of goods – export of non-basmati rice as basmati rice - no leniency can be made to reduce redemption fine - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates