Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2016 Year 2016 This

Validity of revision order u/s 263 - where exhaustive exercise ...

Income Tax

October 18, 2016

Validity of revision order u/s 263 - where exhaustive exercise has been done by the AO, the order of the AO in allowing the impugned loss could not have been held to be erroneous. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 - claim of TDS - In the absence of any demonstrable loss of revenue, interference in exercise of power u/s 263 cannot be justified - AT

  2. Revision u/s 263 - tds credit issue non examination by AO - non examination of an issue by the AO renders the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue

  3. Revision u/s 263 - order cannot be passed by the CIT u/s 263 of the Act to ask the AO to decide whether the assessment order was erroneous or not - AT

  4. Revision u/s 263 - entire materials on record were not considered by the Assessing Officer - It would have definitely be an erroneous procedure adopted by the AO - HC

  5. Revision u/s 263 - carry forward of losses on sale of shares - where there are two possible views and the Assessing Officer has taken one of the possible views, no...

  6. Validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 - Adoption of either of view by AO - allowability under section 36(1)(viia) - The court concludes that the original assessment...

  7. Revision u/s 263 - loss on OTS - since the AO has ignored the relevant provisions of the Act before allowing the claim of the assessee of loss on OTS account and without...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

  9. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

  10. Revision u/s 263 by CIT- AO is first an investigating officer thereafter he is an adjudicator but here in this case, the AO remained silent, but, he ought to have...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates