Vires of Rule 3 (2) (b) (ii) of the Delhi Tax on Luxury Rules, ...

VAT and Sales Tax

November 3, 2016

Vires of Rule 3 (2) (b) (ii) of the Delhi Tax on Luxury Rules, 1996 - bifurcation of consolidated bill amount - as long as there is a sale or transfer of goods or right to use the goods or other services which are purportedly a subject of VAT, that the dealer is subjected to actual levy and collection at a higher threshold is a matter of detail. - Rule 3 (2) (b) (ii) is ultra vires - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Vires of Rule 3 (2) (b) (ii) of the Delhi Tax on Luxury Rules, ...

VAT and Sales Tax

November 3, 2016

You may also like:

Disallowance u/s 43B on account of outstanding luxury tax liability - assessee has not realized the amount of luxury tax - no addition or disallowance u/s 43B - HC

Imposition of VAT - deemed sale - unless possession and control of the vehicle is transferred there can not be transfer of right to use the goods under Section 3-F of the Act.

Transfer of right to use trademark - The sales tax is leviable on the turnover of sales in respect of transfer of right to use any goods - HC

Long Term Capital Gain on sale of lease hold property by the assessee - provisions of section 50C of the Act cannot be invoked in respect to the transfer of leasehold rights - AT

Exigibility to tax under the Delhi Tax on Luxuries Act, 1996 - Club and Association service - doctrine of mutuality - provision of residential accommodation in a club -...

Valuation - sale of Gypsum - mere bifurcation of the sale price of the goods in a mutual contract between the parties under a separate bargain or even a common bargain...

MEIS scheme - conversion of the EPCG shipping bill into the EPCG cum Drawback shipping bill - Since in the present case, the amendment of shipping bills by converting...

Section 5(2) of Delhi VAT Act and Rule 3 of Delhi VAT Rules cannot be declared to be invalid. - HC

Levy of Luxury Tax - charitable trust - running a Dharmashala incidental to its main activity of running a hospital - not liable to luxury tax - HC

Demand of service tax - Supply of tangible goods for use - transfer of right to use goods - deemed sale - The Tribunal observed that, evidently, the Appellant had...

Quick Updates: