Remission of duty u/s 23(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 - ...

Customs

November 14, 2016

Remission of duty u/s 23(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 - warehoused goods were completely destroyed in the fire - Department never disputed the fact that the goods were destroyed - remission of duty allowed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Remission of duty u/s 23(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 - ...

Customs

November 14, 2016

You may also like:

Warehoused goods - Issuance of duty remission certificate - goods destroyed during cyclone - notice for recovery of the customs duty is hopelessly belated. - HC

Remission of duty - Goods destroyed in fire after removal of goods - failure to export the goods- remission denied but penalty waived - CGOVT

Remission of duty - Rejection of petitioner’s application for remission of excise duty - export goods that got destroyed in fire at the Container Warehousing Corporation...

Remission of duty - section 23 of Customs Act, 1962 - goods destroyed while in custody of the custodian - coconut milk - goods were not in compliance with the shelf life...

Remission of Duty - goods destroyed by fire in factory - Rule 21 - In the present case the entire case has been made out against the appellant for failure to get a...

Remission of excise duty - fire incident - appellant has placed sufficient material on record to show that finished/semi-finished goods were destroyed in fire accident...

Remission of duty - Lost goods - When the importer made a request to the department claiming remission, the authorities did not dispute the transactions - remission allowed - HC

100% EOU - Remission of duty on goods destroyed in the fire - liability to pay anti-dumping duty (ADD) - The goods imported were destroyed in fire and therefore, there...

Rejection of remission of duty in respect of the goods lost in fire - once insurance company has granted the insurance claim for the principal amount of the goods...

Remission of central excise duty on semi-finished goods destroyed in the fire accident - The Commissioner clearly exceeded his jurisdiction in deciding this issue by...

Quick Updates: