Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2016 Year 2016 This

Assessee having failed to prove the validity of the transaction, ...

Income Tax

November 18, 2016

Assessee having failed to prove the validity of the transaction, no right accrues in his favour on account of non- summoning of the witness u/s 131 by the AO - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refusal for allowing advance authorisation and a duty free import authorisation (DFIA) - relaxation is not a right and nothing accrues in the petitioners' favour to...

  2. Suit for recovery of money on the foot of promissory note - Burden/onus to prove - The High Court found in favor of the plaintiff, overturning the decision of the...

  3. Deletion of LTCG as non-genuine - transactions in shares - Deletion of undisclosed commission paid for arranging accommodation entries - assessee proves that...

  4. Disallowance of short term capital loss - creation of artificial loss - assessee appellants failed to discharge the onus, to prove the genuineness of the transactions of...

  5. Validity of summon issued - for want of furnishing of certain documents, that has been quashed by this Court and accordingly, the respondent was directed to proceed...

  6. Addition u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure - Since the assessee purchased the stamp and made the payment through RTGS then there is no question of considering the same...

  7. Dishonor of Cheque - non-supply of list of prosecution witnesses - It is true that under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court shall not issue summon...

  8. Validity of criminal proceedings initiated - Non-payment of GST - non-appearance at any date against four summons issued to the accused - The documents on record clearly...

  9. Dishonor of Cheque - legally recoverable debt or not - The Trial Judge ought not to have come to the conclusion that the source has not been proved and non- examination...

  10. Whether the appellant had violated Section 9(1)(b) of FERA - transaction to sell the flats to the two directors were non resident Indians - decided in favor of appellant - HC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates