Jurisdiction of Single Judge Bench to reduce quantum of penalty ...

VAT and Sales Tax

November 29, 2016

Jurisdiction of Single Judge Bench to reduce quantum of penalty - tax evasion - whether respondent was able to establish that his conduct was not fraudulent and that his omissions are not so grave so as to attract the maximum penalty, then it would be permissible - Reduced penalty order sustained - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction of Single Judge Bench to reduce quantum of penalty ...

VAT and Sales Tax

November 29, 2016

You may also like:

Supremacy of decision division bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court and a single judge bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court - judicial hierarchy - Applicability...

Jurisdiction - Tax Case - such writ petitions cannot be posted before Single Judges. They have to be posted only before the Division Benches dealing with tax cases. This...

Quantum of penalty - Tribunal erred in reducing the amount of penalty - Tribunal, failed to take into consideration the law laid down in the case of Dharamendra Textile...

Reduction in the quantum of redemption fine and penalty - There is no statutory prescription that the penalty should not be reduced by the appellate authority - HC

Imposition of penalties - Apart from the statement there are ample documentary evidences which clearly establish that appellants were involved in aiding and abetting...

Increase of shareholding beyond 55% - violation of Section 11 of the Takeover Regulations, 1997 - the default is inadvertent, technical and, in any case, unintentional -...

Validity of interim order - Challenge to the SCN - Levy of GST - supply of Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) - Validity of interim order of the Single Judge bench of HC,...

Recovery proceedings - withdrawal of appeal by the respondent - In fact, the Division Bench also did not consider the order of the learned Single Judge on merits but has...

Fraudulent claims of duty drawbacks - Mis declaration of goods -charges levelled in the show cause notice stood established against the appellants - levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

Quick Updates: