Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2016 Year 2016 This

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - There is no concrete positive ...

Income Tax

December 9, 2016

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - There is no concrete positive evidence against the assessee exhibiting unexplained investment, except unregistered sale deed, which does not confer any title - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on unrecorded receipts, expenditure and investments declared by the assessee pursuant to search confirmed - AT

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The finding of the authorities based on the evidence of the valuer, which was corroborated by the circumstantial evidence - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

  4. Unexplained investment – Gifted jewelleries cannot be treated as unexplained as the same is duly supported by such corroborative evidence like gift certificate etc. - AT

  5. Validity of reopening assessment - unexplained investment - survey u/s 133A - the vague statements giving estimated details without supporting evidence would not help...

  6. Unexplained investment u/s 69 – Assessee paid up additional stamp duty on valuation - This by itself would not mean that the assessee made any unexplained investment - HC

  7. Unexplained investments - There is no positive and credible evidence brought on record by the revenue to establish the allegation of cash payment over and above the...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - unexplained investment u/s.69 - The penalty can be justified only if assessee fails to offer an explanation or his explanation is found to be...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b)- assessee refused to answer the notice u/s 142(1) - assessee was an attorney of some account holder - levy of penalty confimred - HC

  10. Levy of penalty - assessee has been able to offer bona fide reasons for not disclosing the rental income - in absence of positive evidence beyond doubt regarding...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates