Allowability of commission payment - proof that the services ...

Income Tax

January 9, 2017

Allowability of commission payment - proof that the services rendered to the assessee by the payees - assessee has placed on record all possible details in order to discharge its onus on the one hand whereas the commission payments have been held to be excessive without any such comparison on the other - entire deduction allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Allowability of commission payment - proof that the services ...

Income Tax

January 9, 2017

You may also like:

Mere payment of commission through account payee cheque after deduction of TDS does not absolve the assessee from discharging its burden with regard to proving business...

CENVAT Credit on Input Service - quality control services was rendered outside India, outside the place of removal of excisable goods - credit allowed - AT

Addition u/s 40(A)(3) - payment was made otherwise then by account payee cheque - assessee failed to prove - addition confirmed - HC

Addition on account of expenses such as stamp duty, registration fees and other miscellaneous charges - suspicion cannot take the place of proof - claim of exemption allowed - AT

Addition made on outstanding liability - Labour charges as bogus – suspicion howsoever grave, cannot take place of proof - AT

Disallowance on account of commission paid - justification of payment with services rendered - mere deducting of TDS cannot be discharged onus cast on the assessee for...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3)(a) of the Act – Payment made otherwise than by account payee cheque - endorsement of crossed cheque - disallowance confirmed - HC

Allowability as revenue expenditure - payment made by the appellant to the landlord for his consent to the reconstruction of the building - held as Revenue in nature - HC

Allowability of excise duty refund u/s 80IB - There is an inextricable link between the manufacturing activity, the payment of central excise duty and its refund -...

Export of service or not - Since because the ultimate beneficiary is abroad, it cannot be claimed that the appellants are exporting services. Neither the place of...

Quick Updates: