Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2017 Year 2017 This

Refund claim - it is a case of the tax collected by the ...

Central Excise

January 13, 2017

Refund claim - it is a case of the tax collected by the authorities under the Rules by misconstruction or wrong interpretation of the provisions - refund claim would fall within the purview of Section 11B - period of limitation of one year is applicable - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund claims of unutilized cenvat credit - export of goods - period of limitation - initially the refund claim was filed before the wrong authority - refund allowed - AT

  2. Refund claim - claim was filled before wrong jurisdictional office - before rejecting the application, file should have been transferred to correct jurisdiction by the...

  3. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  4. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  5. Classification of goods - rate of tax - skimmed milk powder - to state that milk food is same as milk powder is a wrong interpretation of the Entry.

  6. Refund claim - contention of the applicant is that the applicant paid the service tax under the wrong belief the applicant had provided Clearing and Forwarding Agent...

  7. The refund of VAT receivable by the assessee is not chargeable to tax u/s 41(1) until the claim of refund is adjudicated by the commercial tax authority - AT

  8. Refund of SAD - time limit of one year - the Commissioner(Appeals) has committed an error while giving an expanded interpretation qua limitation to favour assessee -...

  9. 100% EOU - Demand of Differential Cost Recovery Charges paid - Claim of refund of excess MOT charges paid - the finding of the Commissioner is factually wrong - Demand...

  10. Refund claim rejected as time bar - The original authority and the lower appellate authority being creatures of the statute, prima facie are required to follow the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates