Refund - There is no concept of not passing on the duty to the ...

Central Excise

March 6, 2017

Refund - There is no concept of not passing on the duty to the ultimate consumer and as such, as the buyers have been passed on the benefit of reduction of duty, the same would satisfy the principles of unjust enrichment - refund allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - There is no concept of not passing on the duty to the ...

Central Excise

March 6, 2017

You may also like:

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Refund Claim - unjust enrichment - As the entire amount has been recovered from the ultimate buyers including the duty element, unjust enrichment is attracted.

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in rate of GST - every recipient/ customer is entitled to the benefit of the tax rate reduction by way of reduced prices...

Profiteering - restaurant service - benefit of reduction of tax from 18% to 5% not passed to customers - applicant could not establish profiteering for want of credible evidence

Refund of Customs duty - unjust enrichment - Chennai Port Trust (the buyer) had indeed borne the duty burden, as evidenced by financial records and a letter from the...

Refund - Unjust enrichment - burden of duty is transferred to the buyer of the goods or not - Merely CA Certificate per se cannot be the sole ground for proving that...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - supply of "ECLAT SERUM" - allegation is that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of reduction in the GST rate by the way of commensurate reduction in...

Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply - Circular

Refund claim - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - Time bar - benefit of ‘payment of duty under protest’ made by the manufacturer cannot be extended to the buyer - AT

Quick Updates: