Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2017 Year 2017 This

Addition u/s 37(1) - processing fees - the payment has not been ...

Income Tax

March 14, 2017

Addition u/s 37(1) - processing fees - the payment has not been made for acquiring a brand name, but for facilitating for acquisition of the brand name - by applying positive and negative tests, it is found that the expenditure is revenue in Nature - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Acquisition of brand - Payment made for Legal and professional fees – expenditure were in the nature of revenue and could not be disallowed as capital expenditure - AT

  2. Addition u/s 37(1) - non-competition fee - revenue or capital expenditure - it does not bring in any capital asset - the payment is allowable u/s 37(1) - HC

  3. Related persons – assessable value – Merely because ice cream was manufactured using brand name acquired by HLL and entire product was sold to BILIL/HLL, that did not...

  4. Denial of Benefit of SSI Notification No.1/93 – Brand name not belonging to appellant – use of brand name for different goods is permissible under the law - AT

  5. Allowable expenditure u/s 37(1) - addition relating to form fees which was deposited for obtaining the wine shop through government - non-accepting the theory of...

  6. SSI exemption - use of brand name of others - it is obvious that the appellants are not the owners of the brand name, but they have merely acquired the right to produce...

  7. Payment made for acquiring the name of ‘VESESH’ and intellectual properties, copy right - The said amount has to be treated as capital expenditure.- HC

  8. Payment made for surrender of tenancy rights - deduction allowed u/s 37(1) - AT

  9. Exemption 10(37) - acquisition of the urban agricultural land as a compulsory acquisition - - merely because the sale price was fixed through a negotiated settlement,...

  10. Brand name – SSI exemption – contention of the assessees that ‘Micro’ is not a brand name belonging to MPPL but stands for the first name of MCPPL, cannot be accepted- AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates