Refusal to stay the collection of demand - Asst. CIT directed ...

Income Tax

March 20, 2017

Refusal to stay the collection of demand - Asst. CIT directed the petitioner to deposit 15% of the disputed demand - Prl. CIT confirmed the order - it has failed to consider the issue whether the assessment orders suffers from being "unreasonably highpitched", or whether "any genuine hardship would be caused to the assessee" - Prl. CIT directed to review the order - Tri

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refusal to stay the collection of demand - Asst. CIT directed ...

Income Tax

March 20, 2017

You may also like:

Stay of recovery - appeal pending before CIT(A) - circular lays down 15%/20% of the disputed demand to be deposited for stay, by way of a general condition and does not...

Application u/s 220(6) for stay of unreasonably high-pitched and that enforcement of recovery of the demand - applicant directed to deposit 10% of the demand.

Requirement of 20% Deposit of Disputed Demand for Considering Stay Application - The High court clarified that the OMs do not mandate a 20% deposit as a precondition for...

Stay of demand - pre-deposit of only 20% of the disputed demand - adjustments of refunds against demand - respondent is entitled to seek pre-deposit of only 20% of the...

Stay of demand - guideline for stay of demand on payment of 20% of the disputed demand (earlier 15%) till the final disposal of the first appeal - Adjustment of future...

Stay petition - recovery proceedings - petitioner is willing to deposit 15% of the demanded amount - it seems appropriate to direct the income tax officer not to press...

Appeal against the stay order - non compliance of stay order - Instead of 60%, appellant directed to pre-deposit 4 crores within 6 weeks. - HC

Issuance of Garnishee notices during the pendency of the stay application - AO empowerment to grant stay provided 20% of the disputed demand paid

Refusal of stay on the order qua the interest, as demanded u/s 30(2) of the MVAT (stay is granted to the petitioner on the tax as demanded) - separation of Composite...

Refusal to direct stay - When a litigant has a right to prefer a second appeal against an order passed by the first appellate authority, it would be wholly unjust to say...

Quick Updates: