The penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed because the assessee did ...

Income Tax

March 27, 2017

The penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed because the assessee did not offer any explanation to the assessing officer in the first instance and then the penalty was sustained because his explanation furnished before the CIT (Appeals) was rejected. - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

The penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed because the assessee did ...

Income Tax

March 27, 2017

You may also like:

Validity of confirmation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – ssessee miserably failed to offer an explanation for the cash credit raised in the form of share application money -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - on account of survey, if the assessee has offered additional income, it cannot be a ground to impose penalty under section 271(1)(c) unless...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - accepted quantum addition - in penalty proceedings he offer explanation that the jewellery found during search were already offered to tax in the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able to prove that the assessee was guilty of fraud or gross or willful negligence, penalty cannot be sustained - AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – department was justified in imposing the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, as the explanation offered by the assessee is no...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Quick Updates: