The demand u/s 73 (1) of the FA, 1994 has to be issued within ...

Service Tax

May 22, 2017

The demand u/s 73 (1) of the FA, 1994 has to be issued within the period with reference to relevant date as stipulated in the said Section. There is no provision to determine ‘relevant date’ based on the date of knowledge acquired by the Department - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The demand u/s 73 (1) of the FA, 1994 has to be issued within ...

Service Tax

May 22, 2017

You may also like:

Validity of show cause notice - extended period of limitation - Whether the ingredients for resort to proviso to section 73(1) of FA, 1994 are present to obviate the...

Works Contract Services - SCN for period October 2007 to November 2010 - Undisputedly the SCN was issued on 25 June 2014, hence u/s 73 of the FA, 1994, revenue can raise...

Extended period of limitation - In this era of self-assessment, the facts would not have been revealed had investigations into the appellants’ activities not been...

Issue of SCN and payment of penalty - Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

Non-payment of tax - commission received under the head subvention account for providing the services to its customers - demand should be confined to the normal period...

Extended period of limitation - in a previous case involving the same issue, demand was dropped - Therefore, all relevant facts were within the knowledge/ notice of the...

Delayed adjudication after lapse of more than 7 years from the date of show cause notice (SCN) - In the instant case period of more than 7 years from the issuance of...

Penalty - Construction of residential complex - entire service tax liability and the interest is paid before the issuance of SCN - provisions of Section 73(3) of the FA,...

When the appellant is a Govt. corporation, who paid entire tax demand (through may be some interest still remains payable as it was not quantified by the Revenue),...

Quick Updates: