Penalty u/s 78 - the respondent has collected the service tax ...

Service Tax

May 25, 2017

Penalty u/s 78 - the respondent has collected the service tax from the client and not paid to Revenue - The reason given by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-imposition of penalty is that the respondent was in a rural area and not very highly educated - order of commissioner (appeal) is not correct - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 - the respondent has collected the service tax ...

Service Tax

May 25, 2017

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty - Advertisement Agency Service - non-payment of Service tax - Section 78 - when the first SCN was issued, the subsequent SCN cannot allege...

Penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 & 78 - renting of immovable property - case is squarely covered for non imposition of penalties under Section 80A - AT

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Penalty u/s 76 and 78 - service tax alongwith interest paid on being pointed out - The reason of financial crunch given by the appellant should be given some credence,...

Imposition of penalties - Mere collection and delay to remit to the Government cannot be considered as an act of suppression - The penalty imposed u/s 78 is unwarranted.

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

Penalty u/s 78 - failure to discharge tax - Construction services - both the authorities below have rightly imposed and upheld penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - No independent reasons have been given by the first appellate authority to confirm the penalty under Section 78 of the...

Quick Updates: