Penalty u/s 77 - non-filing of returns - there is no demand for ...

Service Tax

September 9, 2017

Penalty u/s 77 - non-filing of returns - there is no demand for service tax on the appellant, despite the fact that he had obtained service tax registration certificate from the Department and was discharging the service tax liability up to March, 2007 - No penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 77 - non-filing of returns - there is no demand for ...

Service Tax

September 9, 2017

You may also like:

Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Penalty u/s 77(2) of the FA 1994 - delay in filing the service tax return - penalty of ₹ 20,000/- for each return - When the penalty has been imposed under Section...

Failure of registration of service - Belated filing of ST-3 Returns - The short payment of Service Tax was not detected by the Revenue, therefore, the reasonable cause...

Health and fitness services - the appellant has not contested the demand therefore the extended period has rightly been invoked and penalty under Section 77 & 78 has...

Penalty - Non payment of service tax amount to the department despite being collected from the client - bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 & 78 - renting of immovable property - case is squarely covered for non imposition of penalties under Section 80A - AT

Penalty under Sections 77 and 78 - delayed payment of service tax - The statutory levies cannot be obviated for so long merely because the computer was down - levy of...

Penalty u/s 271B - delay in filing return - E-filing - non furnishing of tax audit report before the specified date - Penalty confirmed - AT

Waiver of penalty u/s 77 & 78 - during the period service tax liability under reverse charge mechanism was being disputed - penalty dropped - AT

Quick Updates: