Revision u/s 264 in favor assesse - non furnishing books of ...

Income Tax

November 9, 2017

Revision u/s 264 in favor assesse - non furnishing books of account and other relevant material - CIT rightly concurred with the view taken by the Assessing Officer and rejected the petition filed by the petitioner u/s 264 - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 264 in favor assesse - non furnishing books of ...

Income Tax

November 9, 2017

You may also like:

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - petitioner has not waived his appellate right - delay of 2 years, 10 months and 8 days can not be condoned - HC

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - the appeal of the Assessee has not been disposed on merits. In view of this, there was no bar to the CIT in exercising...

The view taken by the AO in computing book profit u/s 115JB being an acceptable view, the assessment order passed cannot be considered to be erroneous - revision set aside - AT

Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

Revision u/s 264 - Petitioners after dismissal of the earlier petition by this Court against the same assessment order without filing any statutory Appeal before the CIT...

Doctrine of Merger of an order - CIT(A) observed that the appeal has been merged with order of Revision passed by the CIT u/s 264 - Prohibition u/s 264(4) - the appeal...

Rejection application for Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Rejection on the ground the assessee has filing an appeal u/s 246 which was rejected by the CIT(A) due...

Applications u/s 264 for revision in favor of assessee - Condonation of delay - Proviso to Sub-Section (3) of Section 264 confers a statutory power on the Commissioner...

Revision u/s 264 - Claiming benefit of DTAA - refund of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) which was paid wrongly - This was not a case where a deduction was made u/s 195...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Commissioner has rejected the revision petition u/s 264 on the ground of that the Petitioner did not comply with the mandatory...

Quick Updates: