Valuation - related party transaction - there is no legal ...

Central Excise

November 24, 2017

Valuation - related party transaction - there is no legal sanction to demand duty from the appellants in case the price charged by them from M/s. IOCL is higher than the price of M/s. IOCL. - Demand of duty set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation - related party transaction - there is no legal ...

Central Excise

November 24, 2017

You may also like:

Valuation - related party transaction - The transaction of ₹ 5 lakhs as loan on payment of interest cannot be the reason for holding partnership and private...

Valuation - Business auxiliary service (BAS) - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - the entire amount received from M/s Indian Oil Corporation is liable to be taxed - AT

Valuation - interconnected undertakings - related party transaction - The finding that the two not being ‘interconnected’ with consequent exclusion from liability to...

Valuation (Central Excise) - Sale to related parties - the price to the related person cannot be called a non-commercial price since the same was higher than the price...

Valuation of goods - related parties / inter-connected undertaking - import price agreed between one OMC and another based on the MOU reached between them can be...

Valuation – joint venture – related parties - merely by holding 40% equity by the foreign company, Indian company cannot become a related person to the foreign company - AT

Bogus purchases - oil cakes shown as purchases by the assessee from 33 parties were not genuine transactions -Tribunal was justified in disallowing 25% of the purchase price - HC

Valuation of imported goods - undervaluation - deemed relationship between GOI, OMIFCO and the Appellants - related party or not - Department has not produced any...

Seeking lifting of attachment of bank account - Given the factual situation and legal precedents, the garnishee order issued to Indian Oil Corporation Limited and the...

Valuation - interconnected units - These two entities charged higher price on the third parties on which no excise duty was paid. Therefore this is not a case where...

Quick Updates: