Levy of penalty - assessee has been able to offer bona fide ...

Income Tax

December 8, 2017

Levy of penalty - assessee has been able to offer bona fide reasons for not disclosing the rental income - in absence of positive evidence beyond doubt regarding furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or concealment of particulars of income towards the said rent, no penalty can be imposed 271(1)(c) - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - assessee has been able to offer bona fide ...

Income Tax

December 8, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(a)(c) - The explanation filed by the assessee about not disclosing interest income in the return of income was not bona fide - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 270A - under-reporting of income - the assessee’s case would squarely fall under the exception provided u/s 270A(6)(a) wherein, the assessee had given its...

Penalty u/s 271B - failure to file audit report on due date - penalty levied u/s 271B cannot be levied for the reason that there was a failure on the part of the...

Admissibility of TDS on tip to the employees - as the assessee acted in a bona fide manner therefore no penalty can be imposed on the assessee u/s 221 - HC

Classification of goods - toys, viz., Talking Parrot - bona fide belief - penalty, as imposed on the appellant/assessee is not justified in the facts of the present case - HC

Quick Updates: