Validity of subsequent SCN - Intellectual Property Right Service ...

Service Tax

February 23, 2018

Validity of subsequent SCN - Intellectual Property Right Service - the Revenue having raised their earlier SCN was debarred from raising a subsequent SCN by invoking the larger period of limitation in respect of the said facts and circumstances - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of subsequent SCN - Intellectual Property Right Service ...

Service Tax

February 23, 2018

You may also like:

Intellectual Property Right Services - the transfer of right is absolutely in terms of the agreement, therefore, proviso Section 65(55)b) of the act are not applicable - AT

Extended period of limitation - subsequent SCN - Revenue cannot imagine that the appellant will continue to follow a wrong practice inspite of earlier show cause notice...

Services of Manpower on cost sharing basis to group companies - Service Tax liability for import of Intellectual Property Rights - matter requires reconsideration -...

Intellectual Property Right service - the appellant should deposit the interest because of the delayed payment of service tax to the extent of R&D cess - AT

Demand of service tax - Transfer of intellectual property right - Hdemand under ‘scientific and technical service' is not sustainable hence set aside - AT

Import of services - reverse charge method - it has not been established if the said ‘intellectual property right’ was acknowledged under the relevant Indian law -...

Cenvat credit – reversal - refund - 100% EOU - The allegations brought forward by earlier SCN was not brought on record as a result of such investigation by subsequent...

Levy of service tax - Intellectual Property Services - The Tribunal observed that the technology transfer did not qualify as intellectual property rights under Section...

Payment made for acquiring the name of ‘VESESH’ and intellectual properties, copy right - The said amount has to be treated as capital expenditure.- HC

Depreciation disallowed on non-compete fee - an agreement not to compete is purely personal - cannot be considered as the intellectual property right - no depreciation - AT

Quick Updates: