Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2018 Year 2018 This

Penalty on the courier company - merely because the appellant ...

Customs

May 18, 2018

Penalty on the courier company - merely because the appellant failed to cross-check the declared value, importer's name, IEC and identity of the person who had submitted the documents for the purpose of filing of courier bill of entry, penalty cannot be imposed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Guidelines for processing of online IEC applications and IEC check list - Circular

  2. Related persons – assessable value – Merely because ice cream was manufactured using brand name acquired by HLL and entire product was sold to BILIL/HLL, that did not...

  3. Passenger carrying golden ornaments,entered the State of Jammu & Kashmir crossing Check Post Lakhanpur without making any declaration - Usual place of residence is hotel...

  4. Sub: Mandatory declaration of GSTIN, IEC and email address of importer in the Bills of Lading obtained by shipper: reg. - Trade Notice

  5. All importers / Exporters need to have fresh IEC code which will be same as PAN - Assessee registered with GSTN would be required to quote only GSTIN while import or...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

  7. Penalty u/s 112 - import made in the name of other firm - Merely IEC holder lending the IEC to a third party is not an offence under the Customs Act and penalty for...

  8. Valuation - rejection of declared value - The value of imported goods cannot be enhanced, merely, on the basis of DRI alerts for enhancing the price of the ball bearing

  9. Violation of section 269SS – Cash accepted exceeding the limit – The identity of those persons has also been well established - assessee also had given satisfactory...

  10. Appellant is not the importer in the matter and somebody has used their name for import of the goods - No penalty - no further investigation - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates