Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of agricultural income in the ...

Income Tax

July 3, 2018

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of agricultural income in the hands of company - how the assessee can claim as cultivator as its name is not appearing in the revenue land records maintained either as lessee of the land or the cultivator? - Levy of penalty confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of agricultural income in the ...

Income Tax

July 3, 2018

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – assessee has bonafide belief in making the claim that gain arising out of sale of agricultural land is exempt from tax - no penalty - AT

Cash sale of the agricultural produce by its cultivator to the trader for an amount less than ₹ 2 Lakh will not attract disallowance, any penalty or PAN

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - profits from sale and purchase of agricultural land shown as capital gain instead of profits and gains from business - No penalty - AT

Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure which was not accepted or not acceptable to Revenue that by itself would not attract a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee wrongly claimed the income as agricultural income - One of the strange features in the kind of arrangement or documentation of the...

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Quick Updates: