Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the ...

Central Excise

July 14, 2018

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the deduction of the amount claimed as refund by them as expense in his profit and loss account, i.e. as a deduction u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - The only possible way to pass the bar of Unjust Enrichment is that the disputed tax /duty is not expenses off in the accounts, but booked as ‘Receivables’ - refund not allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the ...

Central Excise

July 14, 2018

You may also like:

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - merely because the Excise duty is booked as expenditure in Profit & Loss account, it cannot be said the incidence of duty has been passed on - AT

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Refund Claim - unjust enrichment - As the entire amount has been recovered from the ultimate buyers including the duty element, unjust enrichment is attracted.

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund claim rejected – Unjust enrichment - the appellant’s have not recovered the amounts of duties from their customers so as to attract the unjust enrichment principles - AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Simply stating that the goods were sold at a loss does not establish that the duty incidence was not passed - No refund - AT

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Quick Updates: