Recovery of erroneous refund - it was alleged that appellants ...

Central Excise

November 19, 2018

Recovery of erroneous refund - it was alleged that appellants had not the manufactured the goods and issued cenvatable invoices enabling to their buyers to avail inadmissible cenvat credit - the allegation is only on the basis of the assumption and presumption.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Recovery of erroneous refund - it was alleged that appellants ...

Central Excise

November 19, 2018

You may also like:

Refund of SAD - Stamp of endorsement - Even though it is alleged by the department that two sales invoices did not bear the required endorsement, it is not established...

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Bogus invoices issued to take cenvat credit – Revenue has been able to make out a very good case for fraudulent conduct and issue of paper transactions to avail...

No accounting of non cenvatable goods – there is no provision for maintaining account of non-cenvatable inputs in the Central Excise Rules - no penalty - AT

Refund claim of Terminal Excise Duty (TED) - Supply of manufactured goods to 100% EOU - Deemed export - refund cannot be denied on the ground that appellant is eligible...

Allowability of refund of Cenvat credit availed on inputs used in the manufacture of goods cleared by DTA unit to a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) - refund allowed - AT

Special Additional Duty – Refund - invoices do not bear declaration regarding non-admissibility of Cenvat credit by buyers - appellant was neither registered dealer...

Central Goods and Services Tax (Third Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019 - Issue of Bill of Supply in lieu of Tax Invoice in case of Service Provider availing benefit...

Clandestine Removal - availment of irregular CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - the documents as that of invoices, gate registers, raw material registers, GRs and...

CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(3) of CCR - If the appellant has not availed Cenvat credit in respect of ‘Common Cenvatable Input Services’ the provisions of Rule 6(3) would not...

Quick Updates: