Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - merely because the assessee does not ...

Income Tax

January 1, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - merely because the assessee does not carry the matter in further appeal in view of the smallness of the amount involved, it does not mean that the assessee conceded to have either concealed the income or furnished inaccurate particulars thereof.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - as assessee did not prefer an appeal due to smallness of the tax involved that does not mean that there is concealment of income, more so, by...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - absence of due care does not mean that the assessee is guilty of either furnishing inaccurate particulars or attempting to conceal its income -...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not preferred any appeal against the said disallowance does not make it an inadvertent mistake - penalty confirmed - AT

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The absence of due care does not mean that the assessee was guilty of furnishing inaccurate particulars to conceal his income - HC

  6. Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure which was not accepted or not acceptable to Revenue that by itself would not attract a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

  7. Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because the assessee claimed set off of the loss carried forward would not mean that there was concealment of income as alleged or such...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted – the act of the assessee was bonafide even though the assessee may have failed to substantiate its claim that the amount was capital receipt - HC

  10. Merely because the assessee has not carried out any charitable activity during the last 3 years does not mean that the assessee is not entitled to the certificate u/s 80G - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates