Refund Claim - In the present case the appellants are the ...

Central Excise

January 16, 2019

Refund Claim - In the present case the appellants are the consumer of the goods and have utilized the said goods in creation of Konkan Rail Project, for which the adhoc exemption order Of 1994 and the 2002 issued - the bar of unjust enrichment as in Section 11B is not a absolute bar but a rebuttable presumption - refund allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund Claim - In the present case the appellants are the ...

Central Excise

January 16, 2019

You may also like:

CENVAT Credit - Captive consumption - clearances to Mega Power Project - the exemption for captive consumption of intermediate products has been correctly claimed by the...

Benefit of Notification No.108/95 C.E. - projected funded by the UN - Machines were utilized by the job worker in respect of the project - exemption allowed - HC

Inter state sale or intra state sale - In the present case, the goods claimed to be sold by the assessee to be part of inter-state sales were not sold to the RVUNL as...

Claim of refund after surrender of registration certificate - un-utilized cenvat credit - export of goods - there is no express prohibition in terms of Rule 5 - refund...

Refund of Terminal Excise Duty - Deemed Exports - Supplies made under ICB - no customs Duty exemption to goods supplied to the Chennai Metro Rail Project was ever given...

Claim of exemption towards services used for export of goods - the responsibility entirely lies with the appellant to prove that the goods were in fact exported by...

Availment of CENVAT Credit on rail track material - rail used by the appellant is not covered under the definition of capital goods - AT

Refund claim - service tax paid on the input services - Courier Services and Transportation services utilised by the appellant for export of the goods - AT

Refund - Rule 5 of the CER, 2004 - 100% EOU - instead of utilizing the credit accumulated due to export for DTA clearance, EOU unit claimed refund - Refund allowed - AT

Stay of Refund - Refund claim under rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 – unable to utilize the credit on account of closure of their factory - grant of refund stayed - AT

Quick Updates: