Levy of penalty - 100% EOU - it is mistake of calculation of ...

Central Excise

May 18, 2019

Levy of penalty - 100% EOU - it is mistake of calculation of availment of Cenvat credit which the appellant has reversed the credit on pointing out by the Department. In that circumstance, the penalty is not imposable on the appellant

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - 100% EOU - it is mistake of calculation of ...

Central Excise

May 18, 2019

You may also like:

Allowability of refund of Cenvat credit availed on inputs used in the manufacture of goods cleared by DTA unit to a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) - refund allowed - AT

Availment of Suo moto re-credit on cancellation of rebate claim - Export of goods - 100% EOU - appellants are eligible for re-credit of the amount in their cenvat account - AT

CENVAT Credit – DTA unit converted into 100% EOU – Conversion and Utilization of Credit – the assessee is entitled to avail the credit in balance as on the date of...

100% EOU - assessee rightly availed the Cenvat credit and then reversed it when those goods were moved to EHTP unit and claimed refund. - HC

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

Cenvat Credit - 100% EOU - Reversal of cenvat credit availed on inputs removed from the factory as such against CT-3 certificate - no reversal of credit is required - AT

CENVAT credit - levy of penalty - it was only with the insertion of Explanation III in rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 that the ineligibility became unambiguously...

Cenvat Credit - Outdoor catering - input services - Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules(CCR), 2004 – statutory obligation under the Factories Act

100% EOU - CENVAT credit - the appellants are entitled to CENVAT credit of service tax paid on rent of Mumbai premises as the said premises is directly related to the...

CENVAT credit - goods cleared to SEZ unit - Rule 6(6) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - the amendment carried out in Rule 6(6) by way of Notification No.50/2008 was retrospective.

Quick Updates: