Remission or cessation of liability - The expression “include” ...

Income Tax

August 7, 2012

Remission or cessation of liability - The expression “include” is significant as Parliament did not use the expression “means”. Necessarily, even omission to pay, over a period of time, and the resultant benefit derived by the employer/assessee would therefore qualify as a cessation of liability, albeit by operation of law - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Remission or cessation of liability - The expression “include” ...

Income Tax

August 7, 2012

You may also like:

Addition u/s 41 - remission or cessation of liability - when the software library was capitalized, it cannot be said that any benefit or remission or cessation of...

Cessation of liability u/s 41(1) - As per the explanation, the remission or cessation of any liability by a unilateral Act, is covered u/s.41(1) - additions confirmed - AT

Addition u/s 41(1) on account of presumed remission of liability - unless there is a cessation of liability, income cannot be added as per the provisions of Section 41(1) - AT

Outstanding creditors - cessation/ remission of liability u/s 41(1) - no amount stands paid to the creditors – they were introducing their own money - additions confirmed.

Remission / cessation of liability u/s 41(1) - CIT(A) was justified in deleting this addition because the amount stood remitted in the earlier year and not the current year - AT

Addition u/s 41(1) - Although, enforcement of a debt being barred by limitation does not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that there is cessation or remission of liability - HC

Provision for retirement gratuity written back already stood allowed - unilateral act of the assessee in writing back would not be treated as remission or cessation of...

Additions against Cessation of liability u/s.41(1) - there was nothing on record to show that there was any remission or cessation of such liability. Under the...

Addition u/s 41 - remission/cessation of liability - liability continued from past so many years - merely on the basis of surmises and assumptions it cannot be said that...

Additions u/s 41(1) - There cannot be cessation of liability twice - Therefore, when as per Explanation (1) there would be cessation of liability in the FY 2012-13 i.e....

Quick Updates: