Levy of penalty - misdeclaration of goods - Equipment Type ...

Customs

August 16, 2019

Levy of penalty - misdeclaration of goods - Equipment Type Approval (ETA) certificates have been found to be fake - mens-rea is not required - appellant are liable to penalty u/s 112 (a) (ii) of the Customs Act, 1962

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - misdeclaration of goods - Equipment Type ...

Customs

August 16, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 53 - Karnataka VAT - Once statutory contravention is established, then section 53(12) is attracted which provides for levy of penalty - presence of Mens Rea...

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Misdeclaration of imported goods - Bitumen - Country of Origin - Redemption fine - Levy of penalty - The department was well within its right to seize the goods for such...

CENVAT Credit availed wrongly on Capital goods - there is no sufficient evidence to prove Mens rea or guilt on the part of the assessee - no penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Confiscation - imports - excess goods found during examination - there is clear misdeclaration of quantity of distinctly different types of scrap having different values...

Levy of penalty - mens rea in evasion of tax - It is well settled that by merely using the expression “mens rea”, it would not amount to concluding that there was a...

Penalty u/s 116 – There was no requirement of proving mens rea on the part of person-in-charge of conveyance - CGOVT

Levy of penalty - there is no mens rea or any premediated thought in non-complying with the statutory requirements, as no duty was actually payable upon import, being...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Quick Updates: