Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - The appellant have given a cogent ...

Service Tax

May 5, 2020

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - The appellant have given a cogent explanation for the tax short paid, that they were not having competent staff and as such some errors occurred, it was not deliberate. Such explanation have not found to be untrue. - Penalty waived.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - The appellant have given a cogent ...

Service Tax

May 5, 2020

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

Imposition of penalty - Advertisement Agency Service - non-payment of Service tax - Section 78 - when the first SCN was issued, the subsequent SCN cannot allege...

Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - willful attempt - assessee has given the explanation in respect of source of jewellery - no case of imposition of penalty - AT

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - based on the records, maintained by the appellant, the short payment of Service Tax on the GTA service was detected by the department. -...

Imposition of penalty - Demand of service tax - Had the investigation not conducted the said short payment of service tax would not have been detected - demand and...

Short payment / delayed payment of service tax - The clerical errors which crept in a few months has resulted in a short-payment - Penalty waived - AT

Imposition of penalties - Mere collection and delay to remit to the Government cannot be considered as an act of suppression - The penalty imposed u/s 78 is unwarranted.

Penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 & 78 - renting of immovable property - case is squarely covered for non imposition of penalties under Section 80A - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - mere non-payment of short-payment of duties or taxes cannot be construed as with an intent to evade duties/taxes. There must be something...

Quick Updates: