ITAT committed a mistake by not permitting the assessee to ...

Income Tax

May 20, 2020

ITAT committed a mistake by not permitting the assessee to support the final order of CIT (A), by assailing the findings of the CIT(A) on the issues that had been decided against him. The Appellant-assessee, as a Respondent before the ITAT was entitled to agitate the jurisdictional issue relating to the validity of the reassessment proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT committed a mistake by not permitting the assessee to ...

Income Tax

May 20, 2020

You may also like:

RBI decided to permit issue of equity shares / preference shares under the Government route of the FDI scheme for certain categories of transactions

Assessment u/s 144C - issuance of draft order as mandatory and contemplated u/s 144(C) not adhered to - Once the procedure has been followed and the Appellate Tribunal...

Demand of tax alongwith penalty - part B of the e-way bill accompanying with the goods, was not filled - The petitioner has not submitted any explanation up to the stage...

Transfer pricing - Addition in final assessment - AO is not permitted to make any addition which is not contained in the draft assessment order and approved by the DRP u/s 144C

Rectification of mistake - The correct rate of depreciation can be an issue of apparent mistake and it can be decided in the proceedings u/s 154 but whether the...

Rectification of mistake in final order - Commercial coaching or training services - Exemption under Notification No. 9/2003-ST - all the options before the original...

Investment Policy of Clearing Corporations - it has been decided to permit the Clearing Corporations to make investments in Overnight Funds

Tribunal has recorded the categorical finding that no apparent mistake has been committed by the tribunal and no case is made out for rectification - No interference is...

Mere reference to paragraphs numbers of the Final Findings ex facie does not satisfy the requirements of passing a reasoned order. - HC

Where a contract falls for interpretation, the Arbitrator is the final judge to interpret the contract and findings of fact arrived at by an Arbitrator cannot be questioned - HC

Quick Updates: