Rejection of refund of penalty deposited - applicability of ...

Service Tax

November 4, 2022

Rejection of refund of penalty deposited - applicability of principles of unjust enrichment - the provisions of unjust enrichment are not attracted as the burden of penalty is borne by the appellant and has not been passed on to their service receivers. Moreover, it is found that the refund arising pursuant to being successful in appeal, is available to an assessee under the provisions of Section 35 FF of the Central Excise Act. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rejection of refund of penalty deposited - applicability of ...

Service Tax

November 4, 2022

You may also like:

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment - There is no provision in the Central Excise law that the state government authorities would be are outside of the principles...

Refund of deposit - Applicability of Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Unjust enrichment - The factual finding of the tribunal is correct - refund allowed - HC

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Refund claim rejected – Unjust enrichment - the appellant’s have not recovered the amounts of duties from their customers so as to attract the unjust enrichment principles - AT

Refund claim - finalization of provisional assessment - unjust enrichment - captive consumption - even in respect of captive consumption, unjust enrichment provision is...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - When the provisions of Central Excise are not applicable in that case bar of unjust enrichment is also not applicable - AT

Unjust enrichment - Consumer Welfare Fund - refund of cash security which was made in terms of the Board's circular does not attract the provisions unjust enrichment - AT

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Security deposit - amount not to be credited to consumer welfare fund - appellants are eligible for refund of cash security...

Quick Updates: